The British are Campaigning for a Digital Bill of Rights
This past week saw the launch of a cross-party campaign with the ambitious aim of crowdsourcing a Digital Bill of Rights for the UK. The ‘Peoples Charter of Digital Liberties’, as the bill is to be known, is intended to be completed in time for the next session of Parliament. It is likely to propose new rights, extensions of existing rights, and new ways of protecting existing rights online.
The campaign, led by think tank cybersalon and backed by a range of civil liberties groups, is the most significant attempt to answer Tim Berners Lee’s call for a ‘Magna Carta of the internet’, a document that includes ‘positive laws that protect and expand the rights of users to an open, free and universal web’. The idea of the Charter has already garnered support from senior figures such as Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell, who described such a Charter as ‘the foundation of an advanced digital economy’.
We hope …. that our rights continue to be upheld even as we live more of our lives online.
Significantly, the publication of the Charter will coincide with the government’s intended repeal of the Human Rights Act (HRA), which is to be replaced with a new ‘British Bill of Rights’. The HRA offers redress through UK courts for violations of rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights. It has become a bone of contention among Conservative Members of Parliament (MPs) who see the act, and judgments emanating from Strasbourg, as increasingly in conflict with the UK’s national security.
Views are split over whether the repeal of the HRA is merely a cosmetic exercise designed to placate a vocal minority of conservatives MPs, or whether it is intended to make certain convention rights unenforceable in UK courts. In either case, a new ‘British Bill of Rights’ is expected to be laid before the next session of Parliament. The ‘People’s Charter’ will therefore be uniquely placed to help make sure the government’s new bill advances, rather than restricts, human rights.
From Magna Carta to the Petition of Right, the Bill of Rights and the Chartists, the British people have always been ahead of their governments in understanding and pressing for recognition of their rights. We hope that this latest step in the long journey to liberty will ensure that our rights continue to be upheld even as we live more of our lives online. We welcome the effort and look forward to seeing the results.
You can find out more and contribute your ideas here.
On September 15, 2026, the Center for Democracy & Technology and Electronic Frontier Foundation filed an amicus brief along with the Wikimedia Foundation in Meta Platforms v. Bonta, challenging California’s SB 976.
Coalition Urges Senate Not to Let Companies Waive Financial Regulations for AI
CDT joined AI Now Institute, American Civil Liberties Union, and several organizations dedicated to tech policy, consumer protection, and civil rights in a letter to Senate leadership and the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee opposing the “AI Innovation Labs” language in Sec. 10509 of the CLARITY Act.
Not All Guardrails Are Created Equal: Comparing Content Safety and Copyright Filtering
As courts and policymakers work through questions about chatbot liability, they should be wary of analogies that flatten meaningful technical differences. Copyright filtering and safety intervention share real challenges around ambiguity and evasion, but they diverge in what each control must assess, how each manifests over the course of a conversation, and how much can be verified from the outside.
Potential Avenues for Redress for AI-related Harms under EU Equality and Non-Discrimination law: A Visual Explanation
In this third instalment of the series, we look at the opportunities afforded by EU equality and non-discrimination law in providing redress for AI-related harms.