Global Encryption Coalition Steering Committee Statement on the ECtHR Court Ruling on Encryption in Podchasov v. Russia
Logo of the Global Encryption Coalition (GEC). Black text on a white background, with multi-colored squares (dark orange, dark yellow, dark blue, and light blue / green) forming a + symbol.
The Global Encryption Coalition Steering Committee (GEC-SC) welcomes the recent ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in the case of Podchasov v. Russia, which unequivocally reaffirms the position that mandatory requirements imposed by governments to weaken end-to-end encryption constitute a violation of the fundamental right to privacy. This landmark decision reinforces the essential role that strong encryption plays in protecting the digital security and privacy of individuals worldwide. This is particularly relevant for the ongoing conversations around the CSAM legislation in the EU and the Online Safety Act in the UK. The UK is a signatory to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) under which this decision was rendered, and Member states of the EU are also signatories.
As stated by the Court:
“…[the] statutory obligation to decrypt end-to-end encrypted communications risks amounting to a requirement that providers of such services weaken the encryption mechanism for all users; it is accordingly not proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued…”
Encryption serves as the backbone of secure communication on the internet, enabling individuals to exercise their freedom of expression and to engage in confidential business activities without fear of undue surveillance or interference. The ECtHR’s ruling aligns with the GEC-SC’s long-standing position that efforts to undermine encryption not only threaten individual privacy but also the integrity and security of the digital ecosystem at large.
As also stated by the Court:
“…In the digital age, technical solutions for securing and protecting the privacy of electronic communications, including measures for encryption, contribute to ensuring the enjoyment of other fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression…. Encryption, moreover, appears to help citizens and businesses to defend themselves against abuses of information technologies, such as hacking, identity and personal data theft, fraud, and the improper disclosure of confidential information. This should be given due consideration when assessing measures which may weaken encryption…”
The decision sends a clear message to governments around the world: policies and practices that compromise the security of encryption technologies are incompatible with the principles of privacy and security that form the bedrock of a democratic society. It underscores the importance of upholding encryption as a vital tool for protecting human rights in the digital age.
British Public Oppose Secret Surveillance Powers and Want Strong Protections for Encrypted Communications
CDT released nationally representative polling data revealing that a the British public are broadly concerned about the security, privacy, and free speech consequences of allowing law enforcement to access encrypted communications.
Responding to the EU-US Negotiations on Reciprocal Data Exchanges for Border Procedures
CDT Europe, together with 29 other civil society organisations and academics, sent an open joint letter to the Council of the EU regarding the worrying direction taken by the European Commission in the EU-US border negotiations with the U.S. government.
Open Joint Letter on a Public Reassessment of the EU-US Adequacy Decision
On 29 June, the US Supreme Court ruled that US President Trump can remove the leaders of independent agencies and commissions, overturning nearly 90 years of precedent limiting executive power. This decision raises serious questions about one of the key safeguards underpinning the EU-US Data Privacy Framework adopted in 2023: independent supervision.
Return of Mass Scanning of Private Communications through Undemocratic Procedure
CDT Europe responds to the European Parliament's vote to revive the interim derogation from the ePrivacy Directive, commonly known as “Chat Control 1.0”, which provides the legal basis for the voluntary, indiscriminate scanning of private communications for known and new Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), and for the solicitation of children.
