Letter to EU Parliament: Flaws with Filtering Obligations from Article 13 of the DSM Copyright Directive Proposal
Dear Member of the European Parliament,
The Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT), a non-profit public policy organisation focused on technology policy as it pertains to civil liberties and human rights, is deeply concerned about the filtering obligations that Article 13 of the DSM Copyright Directive proposal imposes on internet platforms, and its consequential impact on society at large.
CDT supports securing fair remuneration for artists and creators no matter how their works are distributed. However, Article 13, as drafted by the European Commission, does not do that. It seeks to influence the terms of commercial negotiations between “middlemen”: record labels, collecting societies and internet platforms. It is by no means clear that Article 13 will secure artists and creators a greater proportion of the revenue generated by online content. Neither does it empower them as internet users. Quite the contrary.
Internet users are bound to find the upload of their content being blocked by upload filters mandated in Article 13, even if it is a perfectly legitimate use of copyrighted content. These technologies are far from perfect and are not able to recognize certain contexts , such as under a copyright exception. Even the most expensive and state-of-the-art technology in this field (Content ID) frequently gets it wrong , and blocks, for example, public domain material. It is unacceptable, and against the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, to mandate a system that is certain to erroneously censor legitimate content.
The proposal also undermines intermediary liability protections for all manner of websites, not only the handful of global platforms it targets. This disrupts the internet as an open space for innovation and creativity . Protecting intermediaries from liability and from broad or open-ended obligations to control the behaviour of users and third-parties is essential to fostering innovation, access to information services, and free expression on the internet. These protections enshrined in the E-Commerce Directive must be left unaltered by this proposal.
In this debate the rights of internet users are unfortunately often left out. On 12 September, you have the chance to help elevate citizens’ freedom of expression and cultural diversity online by rejecting mandated upload filtering.
MEPs in the Civil Liberties and Internal Market Committees found much more balanced solutions, safeguarding online free speech and innovation. We sincerely hope you will work on that basis in the upcoming vote.
British Public Oppose Secret Surveillance Powers and Want Strong Protections for Encrypted Communications
CDT released nationally representative polling data revealing that a the British public are broadly concerned about the security, privacy, and free speech consequences of allowing law enforcement to access encrypted communications.
Responding to the EU-US Negotiations on Reciprocal Data Exchanges for Border Procedures
CDT Europe, together with 29 other civil society organisations and academics, sent an open joint letter to the Council of the EU regarding the worrying direction taken by the European Commission in the EU-US border negotiations with the U.S. government.
Open Joint Letter on a Public Reassessment of the EU-US Adequacy Decision
On 29 June, the US Supreme Court ruled that US President Trump can remove the leaders of independent agencies and commissions, overturning nearly 90 years of precedent limiting executive power. This decision raises serious questions about one of the key safeguards underpinning the EU-US Data Privacy Framework adopted in 2023: independent supervision.
Return of Mass Scanning of Private Communications through Undemocratic Procedure
CDT Europe responds to the European Parliament's vote to revive the interim derogation from the ePrivacy Directive, commonly known as “Chat Control 1.0”, which provides the legal basis for the voluntary, indiscriminate scanning of private communications for known and new Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), and for the solicitation of children.
