Cybersecurity Bill: The Good, the Bad and the Maybe
Today CDT, along with 23 other privacy and civil liberties groups, sent a letter to Senators Lieberman, Collins and Carper listing concerns about the cybersecurity bill that the senators recently introduced.
“Changes are needed to ensure that cybersecurity measures do not unnecessarily infringe on free speech, privacy, and other civil liberties interests,” the letter says.
The letter covers four areas: Scope, preserving free speech in cyberspace emergencies, information sharing and privacy, and transparency.
In a separate letter to the Senators, CDT outlines its views on a substitute amendment to their cybersecurity bill. That amendment, which will act as a substitute for the current cybersecurity bill, “improves and strengthens the legislation in several respects” and “reflects the open, collaborate process” of the staff in working with CDT and others to write the bill.
However, the letter also outlines concerns CDT has with the amended bill:
The bill as amended would authorize the President to declare a national cyber emergency that would trigger authority of the NCCC to ‘develop and coordinate emergency measures or actions necessary to preserve the reliable operation, and mitigate or remediate the consequences of potential disruption, of covered critical infrastructure.’ We are concerned about the scope of this authority because the activity that can be compelled is not specified. We urge you to specify the actions that are intended to be authorized.
The letter goes on to highlight other improvements, as well as note additional concerns and concludes: “We view the clarifications and refinements we will seek as necessary additions to legislation already much improved as a result of the collaboration you and your staff have welcomed.”
CDT-led Coalition Calls for Transparency for White House AI Framework
CDT and Americans for Responsible Innovation led a broad, bipartisan coalition of over two dozen civil society groups in calling on the White House to release its Framework for review of frontier AI models.
CDT Amicus Brief Calls on Fourth Circuit to Rein In Geofence Warrants
Earlier this year the Supreme Court ruled in Chatrie v United States that the Fourth Amendment protected all cell phone location information, which CDT lauded as a landmark decision, but sent the case back down to the Fourth Circuit to assess the propriety of the geofence warrant at issue.
CDT and Partners Post Floor Alert Opposing CA SB 1013 Automated License Plate Readers Bill
The best way to ensure that Automated License Plate Readers are not abused is to limit the retention of stored data and to keep loopholes to lawful process closed. CA SB 1013 is a step in the wrong direction, and we urge the California legislature to reject this approach.
British Public Oppose Secret Surveillance Powers and Want Strong Protections for Encrypted Communications
CDT released nationally representative polling data revealing that a the British public are broadly concerned about the security, privacy, and free speech consequences of allowing law enforcement to access encrypted communications.
