Today, as Americans celebrate their independence, CDT is also celebrating the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause…
Recent national developments—from the proliferation of drones to revelations about NSA data collection—have focused the public’s attention on the Fourth Amendment, raising important questions about how this right should be applied in the digital age.
As technology progresses in ways that enrich us but also provide easy access to intimate details of our lives, it’s imperative that the checks and balances that protect against government overreach do not fall behind. Unfortunately, privacy protections haven’t always kept pace with technology. In the midst of revelations about surveillance programs, people across the country are beginning to organize to reclaim their Fourth Amendment rights. Several bills, both in Congress and at the state level, present an opportunity to turn the tide in favor of privacy.
This spring, a bipartisan bill to update the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) passed out of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee. The bill, introduced by Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Mike Lee (R-UT), would require the government—from the DOJ to the IRS—to obtain a warrant from a judge before accessing the contents of email and documents stored online. Currently, the government argues that it can obtain this information without a warrant. The Leahy-Lee ECPA reform bill is expected to go to a floor vote in the coming months. The bill also has a counterpart in the House, introduced by Representatives Kevin Yoder (R-KS) and Tom Graves (R-GA). The Yoder-Graves bill has 111 cosponsors from both sides of the aisle, showing the widespread political support for this issue.
And it isn’t just Congress: In June, Texas became a national leader by enacting legislation that requires law enforcement to obtain a warrant before accessing the content of electronic communications. The bill passed the state legislature handily. Then, two weeks ago, Montana became the first state to enact comprehensive legislation requiring law enforcement to obtain a warrant before accessing location information generated by cell phones.
There has also been a powerful response to the widely reported revelations about the NSA data collection and surveillance programs. CDT has pointed to the mass collection of Americans’ phone records under Section 215 of the PATRIOT Act as particularly troubling. Many Members of Congress have expressed concern, and multiple bills have been introduced to curb this collection program, including a bipartisan bill from Senate Judiciary Chairman Leahy.
This Fourth of July, CDT urges our readers to contact their Members of Congress to support these efforts to safeguard civil liberties. You can use VanishingRights.com to send a message to your Senator in support of ECPA reform, or you can find your Members’ phone numbers here.
CDT-led Coalition Calls for Transparency for White House AI Framework
CDT and Americans for Responsible Innovation led a broad, bipartisan coalition of over two dozen civil society groups in calling on the White House to release its Framework for review of frontier AI models.
CDT Amicus Brief Calls on Fourth Circuit to Rein In Geofence Warrants
Earlier this year the Supreme Court ruled in Chatrie v United States that the Fourth Amendment protected all cell phone location information, which CDT lauded as a landmark decision, but sent the case back down to the Fourth Circuit to assess the propriety of the geofence warrant at issue.
CDT and Partners Post Floor Alert Opposing CA SB 1013 Automated License Plate Readers Bill
The best way to ensure that Automated License Plate Readers are not abused is to limit the retention of stored data and to keep loopholes to lawful process closed. CA SB 1013 is a step in the wrong direction, and we urge the California legislature to reject this approach.
British Public Oppose Secret Surveillance Powers and Want Strong Protections for Encrypted Communications
CDT released nationally representative polling data revealing that a the British public are broadly concerned about the security, privacy, and free speech consequences of allowing law enforcement to access encrypted communications.