Brief – Hidden Harms: Students With Disabilities, Mental Health, And Student Activity Monitoring
A research brief from the CDT Civic Tech team, entitled “Hidden Harms: Students With Disabilities, Mental Health, And Student Activity Monitoring.” Black text on a white background.
By Elizabeth Laird, with consulting support from Hugh Grant-Chapman, Independent Consultant
Schools rely on technology to provide instruction, coordinate services, and, increasingly, monitor students’ online activity. These technology applications raise privacy and equity concerns, which can fall disproportionately on certain groups of students. Students with disabilities are one such group. Prior CDT research found that technology used to enforce school disciplinary policy can exacerbate long-standing disparities in disciplinary action against students with disabilities.
Additional research also suggests that student activity monitoring has a chilling effect on the willingness of students with disabilities to express their thoughts and feelings online, which adversely affects mental health. At the same time, not all students have negative experiences with school technologies. Students with disabilities, and their surrounding communities, often serve as exemplars of positive community engagement practices that the broader student population would benefit from adopting.
This paper expands upon prior research on students with disabilities’ experiences with school technology, with an emphasis on student activity monitoring and mental health implications. Two main findings emerge from this research:
• Students with disabilities and their communities emphasize privacy protection. • Student activity monitoring poses disproportionate risk to students with disabilities.
Not All Guardrails Are Created Equal: Comparing Content Safety and Copyright Filtering
As courts and policymakers work through questions about chatbot liability, they should be wary of analogies that flatten meaningful technical differences. Copyright filtering and safety intervention share real challenges around ambiguity and evasion, but they diverge in what each control must assess, how each manifests over the course of a conversation, and how much can be verified from the outside.
Talking Tech with Roy Austin & Alex Givens on The Future of AI Governance
In this episode of CDT’s Tech Talks, Roy L. Austin, Jr., inaugural director of Howard University School of Law’s AI Initiative, joins Alexandra Givens, President and CEO of the Center for Democracy & Technology, to discuss the challenges and opportunities shaping the future of AI.
CDT-led Coalition Calls for Transparency for White House AI Framework
CDT and Americans for Responsible Innovation led a broad, bipartisan coalition of over two dozen civil society groups in calling on the White House to release its Framework for review of frontier AI models.
Comment to House Financial Services Committee on Regulation of AI
CDT submitted comments on the application of current federal laws and regulations related to the use of AI in the financial marketplace and any proposed reforms to provide for an appropriately modernized and comprehensive federal financial AI framework.