Student Privacy and Learning Pods: New Education Models in a Pandemic
COVID-19 has given rise to new education models known as “learning pods.” Although pods combine the relative safety of remote learning with the strengths of in-person instruction, they also introduce challenges to student privacy that must be mitigated.
Learning Pods Overview
A learning pod consists of students from a small group of families who study together in person, facilitated by a teacher or other supervisor. The goal is to retain the structure and supervision of in-person learning, while mitigating the COVID risks from large gatherings of students.
Some pods supplement virtual learning, while others supplant other schooling arrangements. In one model, families set up a small, private group with other students, hiring a teacher or tutor to fully replace school-provided instruction. The costs of supporting a teacher’s salary and providing other resources can be high, making this model likely inaccessible to lower- or middle-income families and subsequently raising concerns about heightened inequities.
Other models are aimed at increasing equity and slowing learning losses that COVID-19 is creating. Families are partnering with foundations to defray the expense of hosting a pod or joining pods hosted by non-profits or local government agencies. In Cleveland, Ohio, for instance, nonprofits are establishing socially distanced learning “hubs” in churches, office spaces, and theaters to provide students with meals, structure, and a safe, connected place to learn. San Francisco’s Department of Children, Youth and Their Families has launched a similar initiative. Finally, some public schools themselves are organizing pods, supplementing virtual classroom instruction with in-person support from tutors, teachers, or other staff.
Coalition Urges Senate Not to Let Companies Waive Financial Regulations for AI
CDT joined AI Now Institute, American Civil Liberties Union, and several organizations dedicated to tech policy, consumer protection, and civil rights in a letter to Senate leadership and the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee opposing the “AI Innovation Labs” language in Sec. 10509 of the CLARITY Act.
The Privacy Paradox: How Government Data Has Become Less Private and Less Useful
Providing ready access to information collected and maintained by the government promotes accountability, innovation, and research, making transparency a core responsibility of serving as a steward of the public’s data. Public agencies must also safeguard sensitive information when making data publicly available.
Defending State Data: Lessons from California v. USDA
As the federal government increasingly seeks access to state administrative data, policymakers should consider not only legal authority and privacy implications, but also the practical effects on public confidence, program effectiveness, and states’ ability to fulfill their obligations to residents.
CDT and Partners Urge Passage of the California Location Privacy Act of 2025 (AB 322)
Location data is particularly sensitive, and when collected across time it can reveal a broad range of intrusive insights such as medical conditions, sexual orientation, political activities, and religious beliefs.