Greg Nojeim, Senior Counsel and Director of our Freedom, Security and Technology Project, guest wrote for Lawfare, a site published by the Lawfare Institute in cooperation with the Brookings Institute. It’s solely dedicated to “that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions.” We’ve published the first few paragraphs here – click below for the full text.
The CLOUD Act, which became law in March 2018, will pose a number of implementation challenges to the U.S. Department of Justice. The law empowers DOJ, often acting in consultation with the State Department, to enter into bilateral agreements that permit DOJ to make direct demands on U.S. communications service providers for data those companies control even if the data is located in another country. The law also authorizes DOJ to enter into agreements with foreign governments allowing those governments to make direct demands to U.S. technology companies for content and metadata under their own laws, in lieu of using mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) processes.
In a post I did for Lawfare, I explore 11 key issues that the DOJ will have to face in connection with its implementation of the CLOUD Act. Among those issues are:
Whether the DOJ will continue to use warrants to obtain content information of non-U.S. person located abroad;
Whether CLOUD Act agreements between the U.S. and foreign governments will let foreign governments prevent data obtained through the agreements to be used to pursue the penalty of death;
Whether CLOUD Act agreements will require that demands made by foreign governments be authorized in advance by a judicial authority; and
How DOJ will implement the CLOUD Act requirement that orders from foreign governments not infringe on freedom of speech.
CDT-led Coalition Calls for Transparency for White House AI Framework
CDT and Americans for Responsible Innovation led a broad, bipartisan coalition of over two dozen civil society groups in calling on the White House to release its Framework for review of frontier AI models.
CDT Amicus Brief Calls on Fourth Circuit to Rein In Geofence Warrants
Earlier this year the Supreme Court ruled in Chatrie v United States that the Fourth Amendment protected all cell phone location information, which CDT lauded as a landmark decision, but sent the case back down to the Fourth Circuit to assess the propriety of the geofence warrant at issue.
CDT and Partners Post Floor Alert Opposing CA SB 1013 Automated License Plate Readers Bill
The best way to ensure that Automated License Plate Readers are not abused is to limit the retention of stored data and to keep loopholes to lawful process closed. CA SB 1013 is a step in the wrong direction, and we urge the California legislature to reject this approach.
British Public Oppose Secret Surveillance Powers and Want Strong Protections for Encrypted Communications
CDT released nationally representative polling data revealing that a the British public are broadly concerned about the security, privacy, and free speech consequences of allowing law enforcement to access encrypted communications.
