CDTEU Joins Letter to EU Telecommunications Council on Digital Services Act
The Center for Democracy & Technology joined in signing a letter to the Members of the Telecommunications Council, European Commission Executive Vice-President Vestager and Commissioner Breton, ahead of the 5 June meeting of the Telecommunications Council. The letter stresses key priorities for protecting fundamental rights and freedoms in the forthcoming Digital Services Act: (1) preserve limited liability for user-generated content, (2) maintain the prohibition on general monitoring obligations (3) create a harmonised, rights-protective framework for notice-and-action for illegal content, and (4) establish minimum requirements for meaningful and robust transparency for companies and authorities. The text of the letter is below and the full letter with signatories can be viewed here.
Dear Members of the Telecommunications Council, Dear Executive Vice-President Vestager, Dear Commissioner Breton,
Firstly, we hope that you and your families are in good health and coping with the challenging circumstances of the coronavirus pandemic.
We are writing to you ahead of the 5 June virtual meeting of ministers responsible for telecommunications. We understand that the meeting will include an exchange of views on the forthcoming Digital Services Act (DSA), and we wish to raise a few core issues we consider essential for a successful reform.
The undersigned organisations are dedicated to promoting and protecting fundamental rights and freedoms in the digital environment. The Digital Services Act will have immense importance forEuropean citizens’ rights to free expression, access to information, privacy and data protection. With the right approach, we believe the Digital Services Act can help strengthen the internet as an open space for debate, expression and creativity, and address legitimate concerns about illegal and harmful content.
First, the fundamental principle of limited liability for user-generated content must be preserved. Had it not been for these protections, the many thousands of online sites and services that have appeared in Europe and beyond would not have grown and prospered. A legal framework that regulates content dissemination must give new online services legal certainty, be able to start up, grow and scale.
Second, it is crucial to maintain the prohibition on general monitoring obligations. General monitoring would undermine free expression and privacy by imposing ongoing and indiscriminate control of all online content with mandatory use of technical filtering tools. The no-monitoring principle protects free expression and can be maintained while creating oversight and accountability for the use of automated tools in online content moderation.
Third, a harmonised, transparent and rights-protective notice-and-action framework should be a key part of the DSA. This should enable users to flag potentially illegal content and set clear and predictable requirements for intermediaries to have processes in place to deal responsibly with such notifications with due regard for users’ free expression rights.
Finally, the DSA should establish minimum requirements for meaningful and robust transparency mechanisms for both Member States and online platforms. Transparency is a precondition for gathering evidence about the implementation and the impact of existing laws. It enables legislators and judiciaries to understand the regulatory field better and to learn from past mistakes. Only through the combination of comprehensive transparency reports by states and intermediaries can regulators as well as individual users gain a realistic picture of how online content moderation works.
We are pleased that Members of the European Parliament have raised these issues in draft reports on the DSA, and that a recent discussion paper from the D9+ group of Member States also includes these points.
We support the objective of updating the European framework for online content governance to reflect the past years’ significant developments in technology, markets and business models. We will provide constructive input to the recently launched European Commission public consultation to shape an open digital environment with a wide choice of different online services that reflect the diversity of Europe and its citizens.
Op-Ed: France’s Constitutional Council Ruling Tests the Limits of Social Media Bans
Read our analysis the legal and policy significance of the Constitutional Council’s decision on ongoing social media age restriction and age assurance debates ahead of the most-anticipated EU-wide approach on child online safety due by December 2026.
Silenced by Design: Gendered Disinformation and its Threat to Democracy
Our latest paper on gendered disinformation and the EU’s response to this growing democratic challenge is part of our TFGBV series. It explores how existing legislation can be leveraged to tackle gendered disinformation, where the current framework falls short, and what policymakers should do next.
CDT Europe’s Response to the Trusted Flaggers Guidelines Consultation
CDT Europe welcomes the opportunity to respond to the Trusted Flaggers Guidelines public consultation and to reiterate the value of an effectively functioning trusted flagger mechanism in advancing the DSA’s enforcement.
“A Union of Equality” – An Analysis of the European Commission’s New Strategies in the Digital Age
CDT Europe analysed the new EU Equality strategies for 2026 to 2030 in light of their objectives to address gender-based cyber-violence as well as online hatred against racial and ethnically minoritised persons and the LGBTIQ+ community.