CDT & Public Knowledge Add Updates to BEREC 2019 Open Internet Guidance
In Response to the Body of European Regulators of Electronic Communications Consultation on Draft Guidelines on the Implementation of the Open Internet Regulation BoR 19(180)
Comments of the Center for Democracy & Technology and Public Knowledge
27 November, 2019
CDT and PK support BEREC’s continued efforts to guide national regulatory authorities (NRAs) as they implement the Open Internet Regulation. CDT provided feedback during BEREC’s initial consultation and believes the resulting guidelines have embodied the spirit of the strong, user-focused regulatory approach of the Regulation.
In general, the amendments and step-by-step assessment proposed in this draft build on this solid foundation. In particular, we appreciate that BEREC provides additional guidance for the assessment of commercial agreements like zero rating. These agreements can vary widely and their impact on consumers and relevant markets can depend on many interdependent factors. Therefore, a case-by-case approach, is the best way to ensure that potentially anti-competitive, content-discriminatory, or otherwise harmful arrangements are prohibited while still allowing arrangements that provide more choice and benefits to consumers without impacting users’ rights.
We also appreciate that BEREC’s guidelines anticipate some of the new network use cases and capabilities that may emerge in conjunction with 5G networks, such as Quality of Service guarantees. Although predicting the practical realities of these developing technologies is difficult, BEREC’s proposed guidance would help NRAs address some of the biggest concerns associated with new capabilities like “network slicing.”
While we support BEREC’s draft proposals to update the Open Internet guidelines, we offer additional feedback on the following provisions.
British Public Oppose Secret Surveillance Powers and Want Strong Protections for Encrypted Communications
CDT released nationally representative polling data revealing that a the British public are broadly concerned about the security, privacy, and free speech consequences of allowing law enforcement to access encrypted communications.
As Brussels starts emptying for the summer, the risks of frontier AI models continue to capture the attention of policymakers as a key chapter of the AI Act becomes enforceable, and disclosure rules around the use of AI systems and AI-generated content are further clarified.
CDT Europe’s Feedback on the Draft Guidelines for the Classification of High-Risk AI Systems under the AI Act
CDT Europe responded to the European Commission’s consultation on the draft guidelines for the classification of high-risk artificial intelligence systems.
Open Joint Letter on a Public Reassessment of the EU-US Adequacy Decision
On 29 June, the US Supreme Court ruled that US President Trump can remove the leaders of independent agencies and commissions, overturning nearly 90 years of precedent limiting executive power. This decision raises serious questions about one of the key safeguards underpinning the EU-US Data Privacy Framework adopted in 2023: independent supervision.
