On September 22, CDT Vice President Jim Dempsey (pictured left) will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee about the need to update the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, known as “ECPA,” that sets the rules for law enforcement surveillance of email and other communications. The hearing represents the first Senate review of the law since it was adopted 24 years ago. Although ECPA was forward-looking when adopted, technological advances have outstripped its privacy protections.
Dempsey is a leading expert on privacy, government surveillance and national security and testifies frequently before Congress on these issues. From September 16-24,he will take questions from PolicyBeta readers about ECPA reform.
While the law affects all of us everyday, it is little understood:
When can the government read your email?
What does it take for the government to use your cell phone as a tracking device?
The answers to these questions and other questions can be surprising – and demonstrate why ECPA needs to be reformed.
Please submit your questions in the comments section below; PolicyBeta’s comments section is moderated. We will review the questions and choose the best for Jim to answer. Those answers will be published here on PolicyBeta.
CDT-led Coalition Calls for Transparency for White House AI Framework
CDT and Americans for Responsible Innovation led a broad, bipartisan coalition of over two dozen civil society groups in calling on the White House to release its Framework for review of frontier AI models.
CDT Amicus Brief Calls on Fourth Circuit to Rein In Geofence Warrants
Earlier this year the Supreme Court ruled in Chatrie v United States that the Fourth Amendment protected all cell phone location information, which CDT lauded as a landmark decision, but sent the case back down to the Fourth Circuit to assess the propriety of the geofence warrant at issue.
CDT and Partners Post Floor Alert Opposing CA SB 1013 Automated License Plate Readers Bill
The best way to ensure that Automated License Plate Readers are not abused is to limit the retention of stored data and to keep loopholes to lawful process closed. CA SB 1013 is a step in the wrong direction, and we urge the California legislature to reject this approach.
British Public Oppose Secret Surveillance Powers and Want Strong Protections for Encrypted Communications
CDT released nationally representative polling data revealing that a the British public are broadly concerned about the security, privacy, and free speech consequences of allowing law enforcement to access encrypted communications.