Protecting Privacy While Supporting Students Who Change Schools
Students who change schools frequently tend to have worse academic outcomes than their peers. This can result from not sharing education records with the new school in a timely manner, which can lead to delayed enrollment, ill-informed class placement, discontinued services, or even safety issues. Data portability has the potential to address some of these needs; however, that potential must be considered along with a complex legal landscape (aspects of which are discussed in the appendices of this brief) and the privacy harms that sharing information can create, especially for students who are changing schools the most. These privacy harms can include jeopardizing physical safety, creating social stigmas, and biased decisionmaking.
To mitigate these harms and harness the potential of data portability to help students when they change schools, education practitioners and companies should adopt a data minimization approach that limits data collection, sharing, and access to only what is necessary to improve outcomes for students when they change schools. This includes creating policies that balance the potential positive and negative uses of academic, demographic, health, well-being, special education, and other information, as well as reinforcing a shared responsibility to effectively use that data and protect privacy.
Coalition Urges Senate Not to Let Companies Waive Financial Regulations for AI
CDT joined AI Now Institute, American Civil Liberties Union, and several organizations dedicated to tech policy, consumer protection, and civil rights in a letter to Senate leadership and the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee opposing the “AI Innovation Labs” language in Sec. 10509 of the CLARITY Act.
Potential Avenues for Redress for AI-related Harms under EU Equality and Non-Discrimination law: A Visual Explanation
In this third instalment of the series, we look at the opportunities afforded by EU equality and non-discrimination law in providing redress for AI-related harms.
The Privacy Paradox: How Government Data Has Become Less Private and Less Useful
Providing ready access to information collected and maintained by the government promotes accountability, innovation, and research, making transparency a core responsibility of serving as a steward of the public’s data. Public agencies must also safeguard sensitive information when making data publicly available.
Defending State Data: Lessons from California v. USDA
As the federal government increasingly seeks access to state administrative data, policymakers should consider not only legal authority and privacy implications, but also the practical effects on public confidence, program effectiveness, and states’ ability to fulfill their obligations to residents.