CDT Welcomes Recent W3C Drafts of Privacy and Ethical Principles for the Web
The W3C’s Technical Architecture Group recently (12 May 2022) published a first public draft note of its Ethical Web Principles and Privacy Principles documents.
These documents are intended to guide the architectural design of the interoperable, standards-based platform that is the Web, with some basic and high-level principles like:
The web is for all people
Security and privacy are essential
The web must enable freedom of expression
And the Privacy Principles document currently covers some of the duties we expect from “user agents” (Web browsers), why privacy is important in situations of information asymmetry and power imbalance, and different facets of privacy, including controlling identities and freedom from interruption and intrusion.
We are glad the technical community is seriously considering the fundamental ethical implications of core platforms like the Web and appreciate the process of building broader consensus around those implications and how the Web can fulfill those ethical commitments.
Civil society participation can bring direct contributions to these efforts in advocating for human rights, illuminating the variety of ethical impacts, and evaluating the effectiveness of mitigations. CDT has been and will continue to participate, contributing to the Privacy Principles document and other work around privacy threat modeling and mitigation.
But there’s a lot, lot more work to do, including many open issues, debates to be settled, and important sections that still need a first draft. We would love to see more civil society and community input; feel free to open Github issues if you’re comfortable with that (found in the W3C links above), or reach out to us with your questions or ideas and we can help bring them to the broader group.
Coalition Urges Senate Not to Let Companies Waive Financial Regulations for AI
CDT joined AI Now Institute, American Civil Liberties Union, and several organizations dedicated to tech policy, consumer protection, and civil rights in a letter to Senate leadership and the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee opposing the “AI Innovation Labs” language in Sec. 10509 of the CLARITY Act.
Not All Guardrails Are Created Equal: Comparing Content Safety and Copyright Filtering
As courts and policymakers work through questions about chatbot liability, they should be wary of analogies that flatten meaningful technical differences. Copyright filtering and safety intervention share real challenges around ambiguity and evasion, but they diverge in what each control must assess, how each manifests over the course of a conversation, and how much can be verified from the outside.
The norms of conversational advertising are being written right now by companies. Policy should be written alongside them, and it should start with recognizing that surreptitious manipulation at scale built on intimate information is itself a privacy harm, and a privacy law can, in part, solve some of those issue
Op-Ed: France’s Constitutional Council Ruling Tests the Limits of Social Media Bans
Read our analysis the legal and policy significance of the Constitutional Council’s decision on ongoing social media age restriction and age assurance debates ahead of the most-anticipated EU-wide approach on child online safety due by December 2026.
