Related Posts

Tech Talk: Allied for Startups and Asserting Creative Control

CDT’s Tech Talk is a podcast where we dish on tech and Internet policy, while also explaining what these policies mean to our daily lives. In this episode, we talk to Melissa Blaustein of Allied for Startups about how startups and policymakers can better work together. We also explore how social justice and intellectual property are related, while previewing a new legal clinic for content creators.

Read More

EU Copyright Reform: Winter is Coming

Those involved in EU copyright reform discussions are likely to be feeling rather ‘chilly’ in view of recent developments. The original Commission proposal for a Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive was already highly problematic, but with the unexpected change of leadership of the dossier in the European Parliament last month, our initial concerns have escalated.

Read More

Paywall to Georgia's State Legal Code a Broad Misapplication of Copyright Protections

CDT joined the ACLU Foundation, the ACLU Foundation of Georgia, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the Georgia Coalition for the People’s Agenda on an amicus brief in Code Revision Commission v. Public.Resource.Org. The brief calls on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit to preserve equal access to justice by upholding established precedent that bars the state from copyrighting its laws.

Read More

Putting Problems at the Copyright Office in Perspective

Last Monday, an audit report from the Office of the Inspector General at the Library of Congress (LOC) was leaked to the public by Techdirt. The report found that the Copyright Office (USCO) mismanaged efforts to modernize its systems and that the Office failed to notify both the LOC and Congress regarding the scope of the subsequent problems. It is clear that Congress must reevaluate its current approach to copyright reform and pursue measures that will directly address the shortcomings at USCO; CDT believes that Congress should reconsider efforts to curtail Hayden’s authority and instead work with the LOC to implement reforms that will improve the copyright system for rightsholders and users alike.

Read More

Civil Liberties Committee Defends Free Expression in AVMS Directive Debate

The European Parliament is amending the legislative proposal to reform the EU Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive. The Civil Liberties, Justice, and Home Affairs Committee (LIBE) of the European Parliament adopted earlier this month its Opinion on the review, which will be taken into account by the Culture and Education Committee (CULT) leading this debate in Parliament. We welcome LIBE’s Opinion, which, contrary to CULT’s draft Report, amongst other positive elements, highlights the importance of protecting freedom of expression and information in the context of a fast-evolving media landscape, maintaining the liability protections in the E-Commerce Directive, as well as ensuring prior judicial authorisation when determining the illegality of content, elements which we will continue to strongly advocate for in this debate.

Read More

The Needs of the 21st Century Creator

Copyright is a vital source of economic empowerment and entrepreneurship that needs to be utilized more by for 21st century content creators. Because the new generation of creators draws more heavily from copyrighted materials, it is imperative that they understand how to protect their creative works and promote copyright policies that affect the platforms that host their work.

Read More

Reservoir Clogs: Copyright and the Public Domain

CDT is taking part in Copyright Week, a series of actions and discussions supporting key principles that should guide copyright policy. We’re taking one element of the law and addressing what’s at stake, and what we need to do to make sure that copyright promotes creativity and innovation.

Read More

An Unjust Repeat Infringer Case

The dispute between music publisher BMG and Cox Communications has proven to be a standout Digital Millennium Copyright Act case. What the case comes down to is whether internet access providers are required to have a “repeat infringer” policy that removes customers that have engaged in copyright infringement. The court should account for the current realities of internet access and the internet’s significance to economically and socially disadvantaged communities.

Read More