However, the Internet has changed a lot since 2000, and it’s high time for updated federal guidance. We’re happy to see that OMB is working on this, that they are asking for input very early in the process, and that they have asked for specific information. This should help them frame their new policy. Specifically, they want to know more about: The basic principles governing the use of tracking technologies The appropriate tiers for differentiating between types of tracking, with the appropriate use and restrictions on each The appropriate kinds of notice that should appear on each web site where tracking technologies are being used The applicability and scope of such a framework on federal agency use of third-party applications or web sites The choice between opt-in and opt-out approaches for users Unintended or non-obvious privacy implications.
Of course, not all uses of cookies are created equally, and we’re glad to see that OMB is already differentiating between session cookies, tracking for analytics, and persistent cookies for other uses. In addition, they note that it is important to provide services to users whether or not they opt in or out of tracking. While the request for comment suggests that more invasive technologies should be subject to more stringent review, they do not explain how- that’s up to us to discuss, for now.
The team prefers that we comment on the OSTP blog [link?] to foster conversation, but they are also taking comments via the a traditional Federal Register request for comments [http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/TEXTgate.cgi?WAISdocID=752564171870+1+1+0&WAISaction=retrieve], and email [firstname.lastname@example.org]. Unfortunately, comments must be submitted by August 10th, creating a short timeline, but we hope you’ll join the discussion.